Goto

Collaborating Authors

 user verification


Motion ID: Human Authentication Approach

Gavron, Aleksei, Belev, Konstantin, Kudelkin, Konstantin, Shikhov, Vladislav, Akushevich, Andrey, Fartukov, Alexey, Paramonov, Vladimir, Syromolotov, Dmitry, Makoyan, Artem

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

We introduce a novel approach to user authentication called Motion ID. The method employs motion sensing provided by inertial measurement units (IMUs), using it to verify the person's identity via short time series of IMU data captured by the mobile device. The paper presents two labeled datasets with unlock events: the first features IMU measurements, provided by six users who continuously collected data on six different smartphones for a period of 12 weeks. The second one contains 50 hours of IMU data for one specific motion pattern, provided by 101 users. Moreover, we present a two-stage user authentication process that employs motion pattern identification and user verification and is based on data preprocessing and machine learning. The Results section details the assessment of the method proposed, comparing it with existing biometric authentication methods and the Android biometric standard. The method has demonstrated high accuracy, indicating that it could be successfully used in combination with existing methods. Furthermore, the method exhibits significant promise as a standalone solution. We provide the datasets to the scholarly community and share our project code.


Investigating Fairness of Ocular Biometrics Among Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults

Krishnan, Anoop, Almadan, Ali, Rattani, Ajita

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

A number of studies suggest bias of the face biometrics, i.e., face recognition and soft-biometric estimation methods, across gender, race, and age groups. There is a recent urge to investigate the bias of different biometric modalities toward the deployment of fair and trustworthy biometric solutions. Ocular biometrics has obtained increased attention from academia and industry due to its high accuracy, security, privacy, and ease of use in mobile devices. A recent study in $2020$ also suggested the fairness of ocular-based user recognition across males and females. This paper aims to evaluate the fairness of ocular biometrics in the visible spectrum among age groups; young, middle, and older adults. Thanks to the availability of the latest large-scale 2020 UFPR ocular biometric dataset, with subjects acquired in the age range 18 - 79 years, to facilitate this study. Experimental results suggest the overall equivalent performance of ocular biometrics across gender and age groups in user verification and gender classification. Performance difference for older adults at lower false match rate and young adults was noted at user verification and age classification, respectively. This could be attributed to inherent characteristics of the biometric data from these age groups impacting specific applications, which suggest a need for advancement in sensor technology and software solutions.


Mobility Profiling for User Verification with Anonymized Location Data

Lin, Miao (Institute for Infocomm Research, A*STAR) | Cao, Hong (McLaren Applied Technologies, APAC) | Zheng, Vincent (Advanced Digital Sciences Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) | Chang, Kevin Chen-Chuan (Advanced Digital Sciences Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) | Krishnaswamy, Shonali (Institute for Infocomm Research, A*STAR, Singapore)

AAAI Conferences

Mobile user verification is to authenticate whether a given user is the legitimate user of a smartphone device. Unlike the current methods that commonly require users active cooperation, such as entering a short pin or a one-stroke draw pattern, we propose a new passive verification method that requires minimal imposition of users through modelling users subtle mobility patterns. Specifically, our method computes the statistical ambience features on WiFi and cell tower data from location anonymized data sets and then we customize Hidden Markov Model (HMM) to capture the spatial-temporal patterns of each user's mobility behaviors. Our learned model is subsequently validated and applied to verify a test user in a time-evolving manner through sequential likelihood test. Experimentally, our method achieves 72% verification accuracy with less than a day's data and a detection rate of 94% of illegitimate users with only 2 hours of selected data. As the first verification method that models users' mobility pattern on location-anonymized smartphone data, our achieved result is significant showing the good possibility of leveraging such information for live user authentication.